The outome of revisional urethroplasty surgery
BAUS ePoster online library. Ivaz S. Jun 24, 2019; 259526; P4-11
Ms. Stella Ivaz
Ms. Stella Ivaz
Login now to access Regular content available to all registered users.

You may also access this content "anytime, anywhere" with the Free MULTILEARNING App for iOS and Android
Abstract
Rate & Comment (0)
Introduction
This study evaluates the outcome of redo-urethroplasty with particular view to identifying factors constituting complexity and any difference in outcome of revisional surgery on the different anatomic segments of the urethra.

METHODS

Over ten years, 51 redo-bulbar, 133 redo-penile and 48 redo-posterior urethroplasties following pelvic trauma (PFUI) were performed. Minimum follow-up was five years. Patients were followed up clinically, radiologically and by flow-rate assessment.

RESULTS

Restricture rate for redo-bulbar urethroplasty was 4% (3.5% for primary). Recurrence rate increased significantly in patients having had 3 or more previous urethroplasties. 18.8% of revisional penile urethroplasty recurred (10% in primary). Recurrence was commonest in salvage hypospadias surgery(18%). Small glans, paucity of dartos and a thin spongiosum were poor prognostic factors in penile revision surgery. For bulbar and penile redo-urethroplasty, revision commonly involved a more complex procedure than the primary. Following PFUI redo-urethroplasty, recurrence rate was 12.5% (5.4% in primary). The redo-procedure was usually further down the 'step-wise progression' approach than the primary procedure. Associated pathologies like bladder neck injury or uro-rectal fistula increased complexity. Median time to stricture recurrence for all revisions was three months.

Conclusions
Bulbar urethroplasty has the best results both for primary and revisional surgery even when the revision is more complicated.
Penile urethroplasty has less satisfactory results; is technically more demanding and has many more complicating factors especially in redo-surgery.
Posterior urethroplasty also has a number of complicating factors and is technically more demanding especially in redo-surgery. This emphasises the importance of successful primary intervention in these cases.
    This eLearning portal is powered by:
    This eLearning portal is powered by MULTIEPORTAL
Anonymous User Privacy Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies (Always Active)

MULTILEARNING platforms and tools hereinafter referred as “MLG SOFTWARE” are provided to you as pure educational platforms/services requiring cookies to operate. In the case of the MLG SOFTWARE, cookies are essential for the Platform to function properly for the provision of education. If these cookies are disabled, a large subset of the functionality provided by the Platform will either be unavailable or cease to work as expected. The MLG SOFTWARE do not capture non-essential activities such as menu items and listings you click on or pages viewed.


Performance Cookies

Performance cookies are used to analyse how visitors use a website in order to provide a better user experience.


Save Settings